Request Ron Paul Q&A at Apple on Climate Change

I sent this letter to Apple on the suggestion area of their website. Let's all have them do a Q&A of Ron Paul focusing on the Climate Change issue.

Why UF Police Should Be Tried For Attempted Murder and Terrorism?

Should the UF Police who attacked Andrew Meyer on Constitution Day be tried for attempted murder, Terrorism and any other lesser included offenses?

Florida Statute defines attempted murder as


Terrorism "involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life which is a violation of the criminal laws of this state or of the United States; and is intended to: (1) Intimidate, injure, or coerce a civilian population; (2) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (3) affect the conduct of government through ... murder." (Title XLVI Chapter 782(5))


The right of the people to be free from unreasonable seizures shall not be infringed. People are also entitled to the legitimate use of self-defense against violent aggressors.

In this case, as soon as the police touched him he was 'sezied' and 'under arrest.' He asked Why many times. They are required under law to state the reason (501 U.S. 429). They failed to do so. Exercising his self-defense rights he attempts to flee and reacts nonviolently. They pursue aggressively and violently. Although not required to, he states a remedy for the only possible cause of action they could have against him (trespass - he will leave peacefully). They continue to pursue aggressively and violently. After he is handcuffed and without justification (self-defense) they escalate the use of violence to DEADLY FORCE (tasers have resulted in the death or serious bodily harm of many people).

Because the officers were the aggressors without justification and used deadly force with reckless disregard for human life they should be tried for attempted murder and many other offenses.

Sen. Larry Craig: the Real Story - Gold & Silver Advocate and pushed out by Central Bankers?

Senator Larry Craig of Idaho, a strong silver industry, has recently resigned from the Senate in matters relating to sexual misconduct. Who would want Larry Craig out and why?

Article 1 Section 10 Clause 1 of the US Constitution states: "No state shall ... emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts"

Currently, the Legal Tender of the US are Federal Reserve Notes that are NOT redeemable in Gold. The IRS requires tax liability to be calculated in terms of Federal Reserve Notes. As such there is a 28% rate gain on 'income' derived from investment in Precious Metals such as Gold or Silver. As we know monetary inflation of a fiat monetary currency results in depreciation of the currency relative to commodities.

As Alan Greenspan stated in "This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists' antagonism toward the gold standard."

Here is where the story gets interesting. In 2005 Senator Crapo sponsored and Senators Larry Craig, Wayne Allard, Max Baucus, Thad Cochran, John Ensign, Harry Reid, and Ted Stevens co-sponsored the Fair Treatment for Precious Metals Act. Under this Act the tax on Precious Metals would have been substantially reduced. The act is currently in the first stage of introduction.

It will be interesting to see what happens with the Fair Treatment for Precious Metals Act which has been reintroduced in 2007.

Did Larry Craig step too close to the Central Bankers fiat money monopoly and have to be taken out?

Will this Act pass or will the Senators befall a similar fate of Larry Craig? Will Ron Paul be able to accomplish as President the reinstitution of Sound Money?